Our verdict

If sustainability is high on your priority list, then Merrell's most eco-friendly hiking shoe, the Speed Eco, is a must to consider. With recycled materials making up most of its parts, we found this shoe to be amazingly light and easy on the foot. However, its performance and durability are strictly limited to shorter hikes and well-maintained trails. We recommend choosing this Merrell shoe for leisurely strolls through nature while showing respect to it with your eco-conscious footwear choices.

Pros

  • Balanced ground feel and impact protection
  • Black Friday - best deals from 40 stores
  • Firm and stable platform
  • Notably lighter then average
  • Highly durable upper mesh
  • Affordable price point
  • A tonne of recycled materials
  • Fits true to width
  • Doesn't get any firmer in cold

Cons

  • Lacks breathability
  • Frail inner lining
  • oz / 270g
  • Track and XC
  • Not grippy on wet rocks

Audience verdict

83
Good!

Who should buy

Don't miss out on the Difference in midsole softness in cold if:

  • you need an affordable shoe for easy hikes on light terrain
  • you give preference to sustainably made products
  • Traction / Grip

Difference in midsole softness in cold review

Who should NOT buy

If you want an equally lightweight but more capable hiking shoe for longer hikes, the oz / 312g Shock absorption heel.

Another light and speedy alternative is the Salomon Outpulse. Stellar grip and outsole durability for its price!

Difference in midsole softness in cold lab test

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

We are happy to report that the firmness and moderate sole thickness of the Speed Eco didn't compromise its ability to protect the foot from impact for hours on end.

With a shock absorption measurement of 104 SA, it reduces the load on the joints and prevents foot fatigue just as effectively as the average hiking shoe. It's not as abundantly cushioned as the Measuring the mould in the big toe area, we got an above-average reading of 73.7 mm (125 SA), but it offers the benefit of a more agile and connected shoe.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Shock absorption heel
Test results
Speed Eco 104 SA
Average 104 SA
Compared to 26 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
85 SA
Shock absorption
133 SA

Energy return

New

This Merrell shoe also pleased us with a fun and responsive ride which is reflected in its above-average energy return of 54%.

This is the kind of lively ride we expect from a speed-oriented shoe like the Speed Eco.

Test results
Speed Eco 54.0%
Average 50.2%
Compared to 26 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
42.0%
Energy return
66.0%

Heel stack

Measuring the Speed Eco's heel stack, our digital calliper recorded a moderate reading of 32.4 mm.

This is a standard platform thickness for a hiking shoe offering a middle ground between impact protection and contact with the trail.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Heel stack
Test results
Speed Eco 32.4 mm
Average 32.8 mm
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
22.0 mm
Heel stack
39.4 mm

Forefoot stack

The shoe's forefoot stack came in at 20.4 mm which is slightly below the category average.

This is not a tonne of cushioning but makes the shoe more nimble and flexible - just as the 'Speed' in its name suggests.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Forefoot stack
Test results
Speed Eco 20.4 mm
Average 22.0 mm
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
10.7 mm
Forefoot stack
31.0 mm

Drop

According to Merrell, the shoe's heel-to-toe drop measures 10 mm. However, our calliper readings proved it to be even higher at 12.0 mm.

Fortunately, this 2-mm difference is not noticeable on foot, and the Speed Eco feels a lot like most other hiking shoes.

Unless you are a fan of low-drop or even zero-drop shoes, a standard offset of 8-12 mm should feel optimal for long hours of hiking. It takes the pressure off the Achilles and calves, provides enhanced cushioning under the heel, and is more supportive for carrying a backpack.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Drop
Test results
Speed Eco 12.0 mm
Average 10.7 mm
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Drop
16.0 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The Difference in midsole softness in cold uses a single-density EVA foam for midsole cushioning. We found that it is a pretty firm compound that doesn't compress so easily.

With a high durometer reading of 30.0 HA, its foam leans toward the firmer end of the spectrum. It is nowhere near as soft as the cushioning in the Measuring the mould in the big toe area, we got an above-average reading of 73.7 mm (19.0 HA).

Difference in midsole softness in cold Midsole softness
Test results
Speed Eco 30.0 HA
Average 27.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
13.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
39.0 HA

Rocker

Difference in midsole softness in cold Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Difference in midsole softness in cold fits true to size (16 votes).

Small
True to size
Large

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small½ size smallTrue to size½ size large1 size large

Rubber outsole 30

The Difference in midsole softness in cold offers a predictable D medium width which is neither too snug nor too roomy for our medium-width feet. But let's take a closer look at the gel replica of the shoe's interiors to confirm this.

Using a digital calliper, we measured the widest part of the mould at 92.6 mm. While this came close to our narrow category, it is still within the medium range.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Rubber outsole 30
Test results
Speed Eco 92.6 mm
Average 94.1 mm
Compared to 29 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
90.0 mm
Rubber outsole 30
99.9 mm

Toebox width

The absence of tapering and the rounded shape of the shoe's toebox make it accommodating for a medium-width foot.

Measuring the mould in the big toe area, we got an above-average reading of 73.7 mm.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Toebox width
Test results
Speed Eco 73.7 mm
Average 72.5 mm
Compared to 29 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
67.3 mm
Toebox width
80.5 mm

Toebox height

Merrell is pretty generous with the vertical space of the Speed Eco.

Clocking in at 30.8 mm, its toebox proved to be higher than average leaving some wiggle room above the toes.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Toebox height
Test results
Speed Eco 30.8 mm
Average 28.0 mm
Compared to 29 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
24.2 mm
Toebox height
35.4 mm

Traction / Grip

Forefoot traction

The Speed Eco showed some of the weakest traction scores on wet concrete. With a very low coefficient of friction (0.09), it doesn't make the best shoe for boulder-hopping, especially when the surface is wet.

Test results
Speed Eco

Lug depth

Merrell didn't lie when they promised 4 mm lugs on the Speed Eco. Our calliper confirmed it with a measurement of 3.8 mm.

This is surprisingly deep for the shoe's intended purpose but we can't complain since the extra millimetres helped with grip in light dirt and soft grassy patches.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Lug depth
Test results
Speed Eco 3.8 mm
Average 4.0 mm
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
2.1 mm
Lug depth
5.0 mm

Outsole design

New

The forefoot and heel lugs of the Speed Eco face different directions to accommodate ascents and descents respectively.

The triangular lugs in the middle bite into softer terrain while the wide and smooth lugs around them make the shoe more comfortable on hard-packed terrain.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

We are surprised to see that the Speed Eco's forefoot flexibility has not been affected by its rigid platform as much.

Fixing the shoe to our flexibility testing machine, we measured the amount of force it takes to bend it by 30 degrees. At 14.2N, it needs less effort than the average hiking shoe which makes its ride feel more natural.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Speed Eco 14.2N
Average 18.3N
Compared to 26 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
11.2N
Flexibility Stiffness
29.0N

Weight

Designed for easy hikes, the Difference in midsole softness in cold can afford to be a lightweight shoe.

Tipping the scale at 11.6 oz (329g), it is nearly 2 oz lighter than the average. This makes the shoe feel airy and doesn't drag the foot down.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Weight
Test results
Speed Eco 11.6 oz (329g)
Average 13.4 oz (380g)
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
11.0 oz (312g)
Weight
17.1 oz (486g)

Breathability

The Speed Eco is not a waterproof shoe but its densely woven fabric hinders breathability quite a bit.

You can see how thin the billows of smoke are in the Difference in midsole softness in cold compared to the Merrell Antora 3 in our breathability test. Considering the difference, we couldn't rate the Speed Eco's ventilation capacity any higher than 2/5.

When we hovered the shoe's half-cut upper over the LED light, we didn't see any air channels or pores light up either.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Breathability Microscope test

What's more, we couldn't even see any gaps between the threads in our microscope test! Only weaves of different thickness that fit tightly together.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Breathability under microscope

Test results
Speed Eco 2
Average 2.4
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

Even though it doesn't have any special supportive elements or foot-stabilising technologies, we found the Merrel Speed Eco to be an inherently stable shoe thanks to its firm platform.

But please note that its lateral stability is only sufficient for what the shoe is intended for - moderate hikes on light terrain. So it's not the support you need for tackling challenging terrain with a heavier load.

Torsional rigidity

Even though there is no shank inside, the Speed Eco turned out to have a lot of torsional rigidity in its midfoot. That made the shoe much harder to twist raising our stiffness score to 4/5.

This is the primary indicator of this Merrell shoe's lateral stability.

Test results
Speed Eco 4
Average 3.7
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel padding durability

The shoe's heel counter also has some moderate rigidity to it earning a middle-range stiffness score of 3/5. However, this is just enough to add some rearfoot support for short hikes on easy trails.

Test results
Speed Eco 3
Average 3.7
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Neither too wide nor slim, the Speed Eco's midsole dimensions fall straight into the average range of hiking shoes.

A finger loop at the back helps to slip into the shoe with less effort.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Speed Eco 112.2 mm
Average 111.3 mm
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
103.0 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
117.6 mm

Midsole width - heel

The shoe's heel also proved to be on par with the average at 87.0 mm in its widest area. Not too platformy but with enough surface area to keep us feeling steady.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Midsole width - heel
Test results
Speed Eco 87.0 mm
Average 87.9 mm
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
79.2 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.3 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

But there is a bright side to the shoe's dense mesh upper - it can sustain a lot more wear and tear than the other textiles we've tested!

Difference in midsole softness in cold toe protection
Synthetic moulding and a rubber toe bumper reinforce mesh in the high-wear area.

Exposing the Speed Eco's toebox to sandpaper for 12 seconds at a 5K RPM speed, we were amazed by its ability to hold up! Because of only minor scuffing, we rated the shoe's toebox durability at 4/5 which confirms its ability to fend off scrapes, slashes, and stick pokes.

Test results
Speed Eco 4
Average 3.7
Compared to 29 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Unfortunately, the inner lining of this Merrell shoe did not live up to the strength of its outer material.

It literally took the Dremel one second to tear the shoe's collar lining apart! Thus, we expect it to fail sooner than any other part of the shoe (and it won't be long before it does).

Test results
Speed Eco 1
Average 3
Compared to 28 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

We could live with the shoe's torn inner lining but we cannot forgive its lack of outsole durability...

Our Dremel went halfway through one of the shoe's rubber lugs within 18 seconds and left a dent as deep as 1.4 mm.

This demonstrates poor abrasion resistance and can lead to faster outsole wear, especially if you frequent concrete and asphalt or step out of lighter trails to tackle some rocky patches.

Test results
Speed Eco 1.4 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 28 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

As a shoe meant for light terrain, the Speed Eco doesn't have a very thick rubber layer either. Measuring its thickness without the lugs, our caliper recorded only 1.7 mm.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Outsole thickness
Test results
Speed Eco 1.7 mm
Average 2.5 mm
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1.6 mm
Outsole thickness
4.0 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

With a thickness of 4.5 mm, the shoe's insole is on par with the category average.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Insole thickness
Test results
Speed Eco 4.6 mm
Average 5.3 mm
Compared to 34 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
2.6 mm
Insole thickness
8.6 mm

Removable insole

The shoe's insole is removable so you have the option to swap it for your own orthotic.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Removable insole
Test results
Speed Eco Yes

Feels lively and responsive underfoot (%)

Firm at room temperature, the shoe's midsole doesn't get much harder in cold conditions.

Having kept the Speed Eco in the freezer for 20 minutes, we repeated the durometer measurement and found that it only firmed up by 12%.

Whether you're hiking in chilly weather or leaving the shoes outside overnight, you won't notice any major changes in this Merrell shoe's cushioning.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Feels lively and responsive underfoot (%)
Test results
Speed Eco 12%
Average 19%
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
7%
Feels lively and responsive underfoot
29%

Reflective elements

None of the shoe's elements are reflective so there is no visibility in the dark.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Reflective elements
Test results
Speed Eco No

Tongue padding

The shoe's interiors are decently padded with foam which is centred in the tongue and the collar. Measuring its tongue thickness returned a slightly below-average reading of 7.7 mm.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Tongue padding
Test results
Speed Eco 7.7 mm
Average 10.2 mm
Compared to 35 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
5.0 mm
Tongue padding
17.0 mm

Tongue: gusset type

According to the brand's description, the Difference in midsole softness in cold comes with a bellows tongue (also known as a gusseted tongue).

However, our inspection showed no gussets or other pieces connecting the tongue to the rest of the upper! It is completely separated with large gaps on both sides.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Speed Eco None

Price

The Speed Eco is a more affordable option from Merrell and we consider it reasonably priced. The shoe has its shortcomings but our lab tests confirmed that it ticks all the boxes of a functional hiking shoe for easier hikes on light terrain.

What's more, it packs a tonne of sustainable recycled materials without raising the price point.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Price
Test results
Speed Eco $110
Compared to 39 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
£80
Price
£200

Heel tab

A finger loop at the back helps to slip into the shoe with less effort.

Difference in midsole softness in cold Heel tab
Test results
Speed Eco Finger loop

Sustainable materials

This Merrell shoe carries the word 'Eco' in its name for a good reason. Nearly every part of the Speed Eco is made of recycled sources:

  • External Jacquard mesh (77%)
  • Internal mesh lining (100%)
  • Mesh insole lining (100%)
  • Laces and webbing (100%)
  • Removable insole (50%)
  • Rubber outsole (30%)

Difference in midsole softness in cold support