Our verdict

We discovered that with the ASICS Gel Challenger 14, you can get the benefits of a more expensive tennis shoe for only $100! The primary advantage being its fantastic stability for forceful lateral movements. It also carries over the outsole durability and traction of the famous Gel Resolution 9. Sure, you won't get the same level of durability but why not give this bang for the buck a try?

Asics Zapatillas Running Patriot 12 Piedmont Grey Illuminate Yellow Pros

  • Excellent stability and arch support
  • Asics Pantalons Curts Icon 4
  • Grip of a more expensive tennis shoe
  • Light for a stability-oriented shoe
  • Reliable impact protection
  • Plush and cushy in-shoe feel

Asics Zapatillas Running Patriot 12 Piedmont Grey Illuminate Yellow Cons

  • Lacks breathability
  • Upper is not so abrasion-resistant

Audience verdict

80
Good!

Asics Zapatillas Running Patriot 12 Piedmont Grey Illuminate Yellow | Who should buy

Tênis Asics Novablast 2 Preto:

  • you are a beginner/occasional tennis player
  • you need a high level of support and stability
  • you want a budget-friendly shoe that doesn't skimp on outsole durability

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter review

Asics Zapatillas Running Patriot 12 Piedmont Grey Illuminate Yellow | Who should NOT buy

If you are a toe dragger through and through, the Challenger 14 most likely won't last long enough for you. While it looks tough, the shoe's synthetic upper lacks the abrasion resistance we've seen in shoes like the ASICS Gel Resolution 9 and the ASICS Court FF 3.

Another reason to look elsewhere is if you value breathability in your tennis footwear. We recommend looking into the ASICS Solution Speed FF 2 if you seek better ventilation.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter lab test

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

The Challenger 14 is a safe option for beginners and players who prefer balanced and well-rounded cushioning.

Our lab tests confirmed that this ASICS shoe has a decent amount of shock absorption to keep the foot protected from repetitive impact (95 SA in the heel and 69 SA in the forefoot). However, it's not too cushioned to compromise court feel or make you feel disconnected.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 95 SA
Average 99 SA
Compared to 36 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
50 SA
Shock absorption
113 SA

Energy return

New

The nimble and grounded nature of this ASICS shoe also shows up in its moderate energy return.

Measuring the latter at only 44.7% in the heel and 46.8% in the forefoot, there is not much rebound to expect from the Challenger 14.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 44.7%
Average 48.8%
Compared to 36 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
34.0%
Energy return
66.0%

Heel stack

Measuring the shoe's heel stack, we got 30.4 mm, which is on par with the category average.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Heel stack
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 30.4 mm
Average 29.2 mm
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
25.3 mm
Heel stack
33.0 mm

Forefoot stack

With a caliper measurement of 20.8 mm, there is also a good amount of forefoot cushioning in the Challenger 14.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Forefoot stack
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 20.8 mm
Average 19.5 mm
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
15.5 mm
Forefoot stack
23.4 mm

Drop

But we should note that this ASICS shoe doesn't feel detached from the ground either. It has a moderately steep incline between the heel and the toes. At 9.6 mm, it makes the heel only slightly elevated allowing for a cushioned yet stable experience.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Drop
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 9.6 mm
Average 9.7 mm
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
6.2 mm
Drop
14.7 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

A major portion of the shoe's midsole is made of a single-density foam. ASICS doesn't specify what kind of foam that is but we measured its softness at 31.3 HA. That's a moderately firm compound which is typical for tennis shoes.

Under the heel, the Challenger 14 features a rearfoot GEL unit. Wonderfully squishy, it balances out the firmer carrier foam by adding a bit of bounce.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Midsole softness
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 31.3 HA
Average 28.1 HA
asics netburner ballistic ff white silver black.
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
17.1 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
34.0 HA

Size and fit

Size

Asics Tartheredge2 Black White Grey Men Running Shoe true to size (40 votes).

Small
True to size
Large

Asics gt-2000 кроссовки?

1 size small½ size smallTrue to size½ size large1 size large

Asics GEL-Trabuco 10 GTX Women's Trail Running Shoes

The fit of the ASICS Gel Challenger 14 can be described as perfectly medium. Having medium-width Polven ourselves, we felt like the shoe was fine-tuned to our foot shape.

Our subjective experience was also confirmed by the caliper measurements we took using the shoe's gel mold. In the widest part (between the big toe and the pinkie), the tool returned 93.7 mm. It is slightly wider than the tennis shoe average but still within the D medium range. Just a touch of extra wiggle room.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Toebox width - widest part
New test (recommended)
Old test
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 93.7 mm
Average 92.9 mm
Compared to 36 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
88.7 mm
Asics GEL-Trabuco 10 GTX Women's Trail Running Shoes
96.9 mm

Toebox width

There is no drastic tapering towards the toes either. At the big toe mark, we measured the upper's width at 67.5 mm. Slightly narrower than average but not restricting on the toes.

However, if you are someone with wide Polven, you will wish for more in-shoe space in the Challenger 14. In that case, we recommend looking into tennis shoes from New Balance as they have roomier toeboxes and are often available in multiple width options.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Toebox width - big toe
New test (recommended)
Old test
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 67.5 mm
Average 69.2 mm
Compared to 36 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
65.5 mm
Toebox width
74.3 mm

Toebox height

The toebox height of this ASICS shoe brings no surprises as it comes in at a standard 24.2 mm.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Toebox height
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 24.2 mm
Average 25.1 mm
Compared to 36 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
20.7 mm
Toebox height
29.2 mm

Traction / Grip

Forefoot traction

New

What's amazing about the Challenger 14 is that you get to enjoy the highest quality of grip, but for $50 less!

Not only is the traction pattern of this ASICS shoe 100% identical to that of the Gel Resolution 9, but it also showed the exact same friction score in our grip test! Measuring how much traction the Challenger 14 generates against concrete, we recorded a solid reading of 0.76.

The shoe's outsole offered a fantastic balance of grip and give, providing great stopping power when we needed it but letting us slide around the court just as freely.

Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 0.76
Average 0.76
Compared to 35 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
0.53
Forefoot traction
1.07

Outsole design

New

The Challenger 14 features separated traction zones to accommodate maneuverability and more controlled footwork. It has thick and deep herringbone treadlines and two pivot points for a mix of grip and give.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter outsole

Flexibility / Stiffness

The Challenger's DYNAWALL support ends near the forefoot, creating a good breaking point for the foot to bend at the metatarsal joints. However, we found that it doesn't really make this ASICS shoe more pliable than average. 

According to our shoe flexing tester, the Gel Challenger 14 requires a standard amount of force (16.6N) to bend by 30 degrees. This is on par with the category average which is not surprising given the shoe's thicker forefoot stack and stiff stabilizing components.

This is good news for those who prefer more rigid shoes for their supportive experience and forefoot snappiness.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Flexibility / Stiffness
New test (recommended)
Old test
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 16.6N
Average 16.6N
Compared to 36 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
10.4N
Flexibility Stiffness
24.5N

Weight

The DYNAWING setup on the sides of the ASICS Gel Challenger 14 makes the shoe seem heavier than it is. We felt quite nimble moving all over the court in this tennis shoe.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter lightweight

Placing it on the scale, we got 12.5 oz (354g) in a men's US size 9. That's even lighter than average! Especially for a shoe with such pronounced stability features.

For context, ASICS' step-up stability shoe (Gel Resolution 9) comes in at 13.8 oz (392g).

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Weight
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 12.5 oz (354g)
Average 12.8 oz (362g)
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
10.3 oz (292g)
Weight
14.7 oz (417g)

Breathability

Let's be clear, the Challenger 14's synthetic upper is one of the thickest we've seen on a tennis shoe! So, ventilation is only allowed through the mesh tongue and a few perforations on the toebox.

This is easily illustrated in our proprietary breathability test. Filling the shoe's upper with smoke, we can see how none of it escapes through the toebox but finds a way through the tongue.

ASICS Solution Speed FF 2 (on the right) proved to be much better ventilated

This is the reason why we lowered the shoe's breathability score to only 3 out of 5. But the good news is that Mens few tennis shoes get more than 3 due to reinforced uppers.

Even when we hovered the shoe's half-cut upper over the light, we couldn't see a single pore. The material is dense throughout.

The light didn't even shine through those ventilation holes in the toebox! Looking at them up close through our microscope revealed that there is a tightly woven mesh layer underneath. It also stands in the way of letting the air escape so freely.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter microscope

Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

The DYNAWING stability system has a slightly different configuration in the ASICS Gel Challenger 14 than in the brand's top stability shoe, the Gel Resolution 9. But it still proved to be effective in our forceful lateral movements and crossover steps.

The shoe allowed us to forget about potential ankle rolls and focus on the game wholeheartedly.

Asics Marinblå jacka med huva

Even though the Resolution 9 has more rearfoot reinforcement, you can see how both ASICS shoes are taking good care of the arch and ankle support.

Lateral stability test: ASICS Gel Challenger 14

Torsional rigidity

The brand's DYNAWALL system creates such a strong midfoot retailers that we couldn't even twist it one bit! The video below shows our struggles.

Based on this manual test, we rated the shoe's torsional rigidity with the highest possible score - 5 out of 5. It is the same level of stiffness as we observed in the Resolution 9.

Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 5
Average 4.4
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The Gel Challenger 14 also made sure that there was enough stiffness and structure in its heel counter. Playing in this ASICS shoe, we never got a hint of heel slippage or undue ankle play.

ASICS Womens WMNS Jolt 3 Wide Black Graphite Grey Black Graphite Grey 1012A909-002.

Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 4
Average 4.1
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Interestingly enough, the ASICS Gel Challenger 14 managed to achieve a Mens high level of stability without going for a super wide platform.

Measuring the widest part of the forefoot, we got 110.6 mm on our caliper. That's no different from the average across tennis shoes. The lateral outrigger is quite supple in this ASICS shoe.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Midsole width in the forefoot
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 110.6 mm
Average 111.9 mm
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
105.3 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
117.4 mm

the asics gel fujitrabuco 7 gore tex hits electric blues

The same can be said about the shoe's heel width. The distance between its widest points here is 88.5 mm. Not among the widest on our roster for sure.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Midsole width in the heel
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 88.5 mm
Average 89.6 mm
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
82.4 mm
the asics gel fujitrabuco 7 gore tex hits electric blues
99.7 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

From the beginning, our hopes were set high for the Challenger 14's upper durability. With that dense synthetic layer it is supposed to be tough, right?

zapatillas de running ASICS hombre pie plano talla 44.5.

With the speed set to 5K RPM, we held the tool's sandpaper tip against the shoe's toebox for 12 seconds. And the result was far from encouraging.

The tool drilled right through the synthetic layer, damaging the lining beneath it too. For that reason, we couldn't rate the shoe's toebox durability higher than 3 out of 5.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Toebox durability

While there is a toe drag guard on this ASICS shoe, it is not as substantial as in the brand's other models. Even though it offers protection, it won't help much when you happen to brush a non-guarded area of the upper against the court.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter toe drag protection

Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 3
Average 3.7
Compared to 46 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Of course, we cannot expect stellar durability from a budget-friendly model. But we must also be open about the shoe's shortcomings.

The Challenger's heel collar padding was the next part touched by our demanding Dremel. The delicate mesh gave in rather quickly as it took a mere 4 seconds to tear it apart.

On a 1-5 scale, where 1 is the least abrasion-resistant, we gave it the lowest score.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Heel padding durability test
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 1
Average 3.3
Compared to 46 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

Seeing the pitfalls of the upper, we were more cautious about the shoe's outsole durability. But luckily, it performed rather well in our lab tests.

First of all, its rubber compound is adequately hard, showing 86.5 HA on our durometer. This is just as hard as in the more expensive tennis shoes. Softer rubbers tend to wear out way faster on the hard court.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Outsole hardness
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 86.5 HC
Average 86.0 HC
asics netburner ballistic ff white silver black.
Compared to 43 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
78.5 HC
Outsole hardness
92.0 HC

Outsole durability

Going all out, we amped up the Dremel speed to 10K RPM and held its sandpaper tip against the shoe's outsole for 22 seconds.

The shoe's AHAR PLUS rubber held up fabulously, just like we would expect from ASICS' top-tier outsole. It seems as though the Dremel only brushed the dust off the shoe as our tread gauge showed a minuscule dent of 0.4 mm.

Smaller than average, it reassured us of the Challenger 14's shelf life.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Outsole durability test
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 0.4 mm
Average 0.8 mm
Compared to 46 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Even though there is no durability warranty for this ASICS shoe, its resistance to abrasion and the amount of rubber look promising enough to us.

Based on our caliper measurements, the outsole of the Challenger is 4.1 mm thick. That's a solid slab of rubber to wear through!

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Outsole thickness
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 4.1 mm
Average 4.2 mm
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
3.0 mm
Outsole thickness
5.2 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

Finishing up the shoe's cushioning setup is a fairly well-padded insole. Based on our caliper, it is 5.2 mm thick which is standard for tennis footwear.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Insole thickness
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 5.2 mm
Average 5.1 mm
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
3.4 mm
Insole thickness
7.5 mm

Removable insole

If you happen to use custom orthotics or a different kind of insert, the shoe's stock insole is easily removable and can be swapped just like that.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Removable insole
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Yes

Tongue padding

On the inside, this ASICS shoe is all about padding and comfort. It packs lots of foam around the collar as well as in the tongue.

The tongue in particular is 10.5 mm thick! That's notably thicker than average, by a few millimeters. So don't mind the $100 price tag - ASICS made sure that you get the cushiest experience inside the shoe.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Tongue padding
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter 10.5 mm
Average 8.1 mm
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
2.5 mm
Tongue padding
13.3 mm

Tongue: gusset type

Given its price point, the ASICS Challenger 14 is a simple shoe. It doesn't feature extra add-ons such as tongue gussets. So there is a small risk of tongue shifting in this model but nothing too critical.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter None

Heel tab

There are no heel tabs to retailers onto when putting on the ASICS Gel Challenger 14. But the fact that its tongue is not gusseted really helps to keep the shoe's opening wide and slide into it quickly.

Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter Heel tab
Test results
Colette x La MJC x Asics GT II Sold Out Chapter None