Our verdict

We thoroughly enjoyed the light and minimal feel of the oz / 284g. The shoe's grounded platform and low (alas, not zero) drop made us feel a step closer to being barefoot. Its highly flexible construction followed every movement of our feet, while the toebox offered plenty of space for splaying our toes. While this Altra shoe is not ideal for the rigors of Crossfit, it is a perfect companion for moderate workouts and getting your foot/leg muscles more activated than ususal.

Pros

  • Unique features of the oz / 284g make it stand out from many other training shoes
  • Promotes natural biomechanics
  • Light and barely felt on the foot
  • Very flexible, bends easily with the foot
  • Highly breathable upper
  • Track and XC
  • Solid durability for gym use
  • Goog grip on gym surfaces

Cons

  • Not for serious Crossfit or heavy lifting
  • Not a true zero-drop (3.1 mm)
  • Very flexible, bends easily with the foot

Audience verdict

86
Great!

Who should buy

Unique features of the oz / 284g make it stand out from many other training shoes.

It's not for everyone but we believe that this shoe will be a great match for athletes who are after the following:

  • a low-drop training shoe that encourages more muscle engagement
  • a grounded, low-stack trainer for better balance and movement control
  • Meanwhile, the tip of the toebox turned out to be the widest in our roster at 87.3 mm
  • Midsole width - forefoot

oz / 284g review

Who should NOT buy

If your typical workout involves lots of heavy lifting or demanding WODs, the oz / 284g may not offer enough stability and support. We recommend turning to the trusted Nike Metcon 9 instead.

And if you do want a minimalist training shoe but don't need as much toebox space, consider the New Balance Minimus TR.

oz / 284g lab test

Cushioning

Shock absorption

Its minimal platform didn't hold the oz / 284g back from offering better impact protection than the average cross-trainer.

With shock absorption readings of 92 SA in the heel and 75 SA in the forefoot, we found that the shoe offers a great buffer for high-impact exercises and running intervals.

oz / 284g Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Retailer Data Access API 92 SA
Average 81 SA
Compared to 23 training shoes
Number of shoes
12 SA
Shock absorption
109 SA

Energy return

The energy loss is very minimal given the firm and low-stack nature of this Altra shoe.

Recording its energy return at 59.6% in the heel and 61.1% in the forefoot, we can confirm that it gives most of your force back to your feet, making jumps and dynamic exercises as effortless as they can be.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
Retailer Data Access API 59.6%
Average 55.3%
Compared to 23 training shoes
Number of shoes
40.0%
Energy return
65.0%

Heel stack

Measuring the heel stack of the oz / 284g, our caliper showed 23.1 mm. Exactly as stated by the brand.

oz / 284g stack

While this is not considered minimalist, this stack is slightly thinner than average and feels grounded. We experienced a very intimate contact with the floor which made it easier to control our movements and make microadjustments with the feet.

oz / 284g Heel stack
Test results
Retailer Data Access API 23.1 mm
Average 24.6 mm
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
14.0 mm
Heel stack
36.2 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot stack measurement, however, showed only 20.0 mm. This is 3 mm lower than the official specs (23 mm).

On its own, we have no problem with a 20-mm stack as it offers a perfect balance of ground feel and cushioning. What bothers us, is the fact that this discrepancy affects the shoe's heel-to-toe drop measurement.

oz / 284g Forefoot stack
Test results
Retailer Data Access API 20.0 mm
Average 18.2 mm
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
11.8 mm
Forefoot stack
27.7 mm

Drop

Calculating the difference in stack heights, we were disappointed with the result. As it turns out, the oz / 284g is not the true zero-drop shoe it is marketed to be.

Based on our lab measurements, it comes in at 3.1 mm! Even though most people won't notice the difference, those who are into minimalist training shoes will. Thus, we must report such discrepancies.

oz / 284g Drop

Athletes who prefer zero- or low-drop training shoes are looking for a more natural positioning of their feet and legs. When your heels are on the same level as your toes, it promotes better muscle activation during the workout, better ankle mobility, balance, and, in the long term, even better posture.

However, zero/low-drop shoes take some getting used to and can even be adverse for people with injuries or some foot conditions. We recommend consulting a podiatrist or a physiotherapist before opting for this type of footwear.

oz / 284g lifting

Test results
Retailer Data Access API 3.1 mm
Average 6.3 mm
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.1 mm
Drop
13.4 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

To prevent wobbliness and compression underfoot, a training shoe must have a firm sole. And the oz / 284g lives up to the expectation.

As our durometer measurement shows, the shoe's foam has a reading of 32.4 HA which is 20% firmer than the average of training shoes.

And yet, we wouldn't recommend lifting heavy (over 300 lbs/135 kg) in the Retailer Data Access API. There is still some compression in the midsole and the shoe is way too flexible.

oz / 284g Midsole softness
Test results
Retailer Data Access API 32.4 HA
Average 27.8 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 42 training shoes
Number of shoes
17.4 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
41.0 HA

Size and fit

Size

oz / 284g fits true to size (42 votes).

Small
True to size
Large

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small½ size smallTrue to size½ size large1 size large

Toebox width - widest part

When you lift a heavy bar off the floor or try to balance on one foot, your toes tend to splay and grab a wider area to achieve stability.

That's why it's crucial to have enough space in the toebox and Altra is aware of how important it is.

oz / 284g fit

Just by looking at the Soltice XT 2, we can tell that it is the widest toebox we've seen in a training shoe. It is ready to accommodate the widest feet out there.

Measuring its widest area with a caliper, we got 102.7 mm which is a few millimeters above the average.

oz / 284g Toebox width at the widest part

This test follows an older methodology, which is why you don't see recently tested shoes in the chart. Results from different methodologies can not be compared.

Test results
Retailer Data Access API 102.7 mm
Average 100.5 mm
Compared to 40 training shoes
Number of shoes
90.4 mm
Width / Fit
108.5 mm

Toebox width - big toe

Meanwhile, the tip of the toebox turned out to be the widest in our roster at 87.3 mm!

For reference, the Nike Metcon 9 has a measurement of 81.4 mm and is considered to have a wide toebox. Thus, the oz / 284g earns the proud title of an extra wide toebox.

oz / 284g vs Nike Metcon 9 Toebox width at the big toe

This test follows an older methodology, which is why you don't see recently tested shoes in the chart. Results from different methodologies can not be compared.

Test results
Retailer Data Access API 87.3 mm
Average 78.8 mm
Compared to 33 training shoes
Number of shoes
65.0 mm
Toebox width
89.4 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

Testing the Retailer Data Access API's gripping capacity in the forefoot, our machine recorded a solid friction score of 0.32. That means good traction on gym rubber mats and hardwood floors for your cross-training workouts.

Pair that with the shoe's low stack and multiple flex grooves, and you feel like you're grabbing the floor with your feet.

Test results
Retailer Data Access API 0.32
Average 0.33
Compared to 22 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.18
Forefoot traction
0.53

Outsole design

The shoe's strategic rubber placement leaves plenty of space for flex grooves of all shapes and sizes allowing for the most unhindered movements.

oz / 284g Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

The oz / 284g is one of the most flexible training shoes we've tested. Thanks to the Innerflex technology, its midsole bends exceptionally well to mimic a barefoot experience.

Doing planks, lunges, sled pushes, stretches, and other exercises, we never faced resistance from this Altra shoe.

oz / 284g Flexibility / Stiffness

In the lab, we measured how much force it takes to bend the Retailer Data Access API to a 30-degree angle. Requiring only 7.3N, this shoe is in fact 35% more pliable than the average trainer!

oz / 284g innerflex

Test results
Retailer Data Access API 7.3N
Average 10.1N
Compared to 23 training shoes
Number of shoes
3.3N
Flexibility Stiffness
19.3N

Weight

Lightness is one of this Altra shoe's main virtues. Doing all sorts of agility work and cardio is a blessing in this trainer! 

Tipping the scale at only 9.0 oz (254g) in a men's US size 9, it is among the lightest in our roster. Basically, this shoe is only second to minimalist trainers.

Paired with its low stack and drop, such a light weight makes the Retailer Data Access API feel barely present on the foot.

oz / 284g Weight
Test results
Retailer Data Access API 9.0 oz (254g)
Average 10.8 oz (306g)
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
6.4 oz (181g)
Weight
13.8 oz (392g)

Breathability

We weren't worried about breaking some sweat in the oz / 284g. The shoe's mesh upper stayed wonderfully ventilated the entire workout, letting the air in and out of the shoe.

Our personal experience was also backed up by a smoke-pumping machine test. The smoke effortlessly passed through the fabric in the toebox and other parts of the shoe.

It all made sense when we hovered the shoe's half-cut upper over the light. It showed how thin the mesh actually is and how large its breathing pores are.

oz / 284g microscope

We also grabbed our microscope for a close-up view. It clearly shows the varying thickness of threads in the shoe's fabric. Areas with thinner threads make up the ventilation pores.

Not a true zero-drop 3.1 mm!

oz / 284g microscope upper

Test results
Retailer Data Access API 5
Average 3.6
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

The oz / 284g has no stabilizing components. But as a low-stack/low-drop trainer, it comes with some inherent stability.

Torsional rigidity

This Altra shoe bends and twists any way you like. It moves along with the foot with ease but has limits when it comes to lifting heavy weight.

On a 1-5 scale, we rated the shoe's torsional rigidity with the lowest score of 1.

Test results
Retailer Data Access API 1
Average 2.8
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

There is not much support around the ankle either, so don't expect a firm foothold.

As our push-and-squeeze test shows, the shoe's heel counter is highly flexible, earning only 2 out of 5 on a stiffness scale. 

Test results
Retailer Data Access API 2
Average 2.7
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Because the Retailer Data Access API follows the foot's natural shape, it doesn't have a very wide platform.

We measured the widest part of the forefoot at 110.5 mm which is the same as the average of training shoes.

oz / 284g Midsole width in the forefoot
Test results
Retailer Data Access API 110.5 mm
Average 110.8 mm
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
101.0 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
117.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

However, the heel area of the platform turns out to be narrower than most trainers.

With a caliper measurement of 76.7 mm, it is a whole centimeter narrower than average. This is another factor that detracts from the shoe's stability for serious Crossfit and heavy lifting.

oz / 284g Midsole width in the heel
Test results
Retailer Data Access API 76.7 mm
Average 87.1 mm
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
71.1 mm
Midsole width - heel
97.4 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

It was smart of Altra to cover such delicate mesh with a sturdy overlay on the toebox.

To test its abrasion resistance, we equipped ourselves with a Dremel and drilled the center of the toebox for 12 seconds. For the record, the speed (5K RPM) and pressure (3.2N) remained consistent.

The Retailer Data Access API passed our durability test with flying colors!

oz / 284g Toebox durability test

Sure, the Dremel left a scuff but the overlay didn't let the tool get to the mesh. And that deserves a high score of 4 out of 5 for toebox durability.

Test results
Retailer Data Access API 4
Average 2.5
Compared to 32 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Midsole softness soft to firm.

After a very short bout of drilling (4 seconds), the shoe's heel padding got significantly damaged.

On a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is the absolute worst, we rated the shoe's durability in this area as 2. Altra could do better here!

oz / 284g Heel padding durability test
Test results
Retailer Data Access API 2
Average 2.7
Compared to 30 training shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

Checking the shoe's outsole hardness, we were a bit worried about its soft nature.

With a durometer measurement of 71.0 HC, it turned out to be 20% softer than the average training shoe. Will the oz / 284g have the same capacity to last as the other trainers?

oz / 284g Outsole hardness
Test results
Retailer Data Access API 71.0 HC
Average 83.3 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 40 training shoes
Number of shoes
71.0 HC
Outsole hardness
94.5 HC

Outsole durability

Our surefire way to tell is to drill the shoe's outsole with a Dremel.

This time, we set the tool's speed to 10K RPM and extended the drilling time to 22 seconds. Luckily, the Altra's rubber outsole persisted!

Showing only 0.9 mm of damage, it held up just as fine as the other training shoes (even those with firmer outsoles!).

oz / 284g Outsole durability test

This fact made us confident about the shoe's outsole longevity in the gym. However, we still don't recommend it for casual wear outside the gym because soft rubber will wear out faster in that scenario. 

Test results
Retailer Data Access API 0.9 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 28 training shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Another reason why we think it's best to keep the Altra Solstice indoors is its outsole thickness.

With a caliper measurement of 3.1 mm, it is slightly thinner than average but is more than enough for gym use.

Number of shoes Reebok Nano X3 Adventure instead (4.1 mm of outsole thickness).

oz / 284g Outsole thickness
Test results
Retailer Data Access API 3.1 mm
Average 3.6 mm
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
2.1 mm
Outsole thickness
5.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

It may be low-stacked but the Retailer Data Access API comes with a very well-padded insole. Showing 5.6 mm on our caliper, it is among the thickest we've seen in training shoes.

This is a welcome touch of comfort and cushioning as there is not much to rely on in the shoe's firm midsole. 

oz / 284g Insole thickness
Test results
Retailer Data Access API 5.6 mm
Average 4.0 mm
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
1.7 mm
Insole thickness
7.2 mm

Removable insole

The Retailer Data Access API comes with a large enough loop hole (yes, thank you!) which is very handy for getting the trainer on with little effort.

oz / 284g Removable insole
Test results
Retailer Data Access API Yes

Tongue padding

The tongue of this Altra shoe is lightly padded with 6.0 mm of foam. This is an average amount of padding for training shoes.

oz / 284g Tongue padding

Width / fit.

Test results
Retailer Data Access API 6.0 mm
Average 5.5 mm
Compared to 43 training shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Tongue padding
10.4 mm

Heel tab

A large finger loop at the back of the shoe aids with the on-and-off.

oz / 284g Heel tab
Test results
Retailer Data Access API Finger loop

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue of this Altra shoe is not gusseted but considering the minimalist design of this trainer, we never had issues with the lockdown or bunching in its upper.

oz / 284g Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Retailer Data Access API None